KeenerCovington49

Today, theres certainly not anything wrong with this, I only think that authors who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or customers. Such source boxes is only going to benefit their site ratings in a... I run an article directory on my site, and I am seeing an ever-increasing quantity of articles being published, solely for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is most likely due to the increasing amount of PLR articles and material that is becoming available. Discover more about linkemperor.com by browsing our unusual encyclopedia. Now, theres certainly not anything wrong with this, I just believe that writers who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or customers. Such reference boxes will simply benefit their site ranks in incoming links that are valued by any search engine. Is this a bad thing? No. Where theyre losing out can be as follows. Much of the traffic to my report service comes from search engines, by people searching for information on a particular subject. Now, this user types in their keywords, clicks on the search box, and is given a summary of relevant sites. They chose one, and are taken to the authors article. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, believe This is interesting and go to the authors reference field at the conclusion of the article to see what else they have to say on this issue. There, they find a link to some site promotion mobile ringtones. If you believe any thing, you will perhaps hate to explore about link empereor. May be the reader likely to be impressed, or thinking about this? Not very likely. They wish to check out snowboarding, not modify their phone. Identify extra info on a related web page - Navigate to this URL PureVolume™ Were Listening To You. I really believe among three things may happen then The reader leaves the entire site in disgust. The viewer clicks on the link to your related article. The reader clicks on a related Google AdSense or similar contextual promotion offer. They dont click the authors reference link. That is a potential customer dropped, very probably for good. Yes, put a link in to your website in the source field, but many article sites allow many links, therefore for goodness sake put a link in that ;s associated with the article subject too, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the consumer. But my site doesnt have any such thing regarding that subject onto it Then add a thing that does. Put an article service, and have the resource box saying To see more articles on this issue, click here. Add a web directory, and have the written text say To look at links to sites with this issue, just click here. Or just go to ClickBank, look for related projects, and have a link to them, with the link saying something like If you want to learn more on this subject, buy this product. Preferably, not a direct connect to the item, but a cloaked or redirected one. By doing this, you still get that url to your website that you were after originally, but, additionally, youve the opportunity to generate income from your reader in a new way. A win-win situation. To compare additional info, consider checking out intangible. Plus, you dont look like someone only distributing acquired content on any subject only for the sake of the backlink it will give you. An infinitely more professional look. Is not it worth making the effort to make greater use of the resource field?.